That's what "success" actually means in a game. Not sure how I feel about doing the same thing all over again, tbh. If you fight your tier V full AA skills captains in regular ships+ AA upgrades (note that they are still bad even with upgrades) against enemy's CV's "Evasive Maneuver" and "Air supremacy", you will most likely loose. Let's consider this: a tier V CV player has access to a certain set of skills. As I have pointed before, Automatic AA in WoW's is miserable even against auto-drops. I made a lot of damage & kills and still, I was called names and I was being reported.ģ. However, this time I decided to try another approach, so I annoyed my enemies as much as I could - from cover. I usually like to play in plain view, as I consider it to be more honorable. If I choose to play a "glass ship" like Königsberg, I might stay behind a island or something. It seems that some basic info needs to be posted in event dedicated pages, as kids playing this game lack the idea of "different ships, different tactics". One of them i consider to be bad - Okhotnik. I don't understand the logic in fighting ranked with a DD which has bad camo, short torp range and the maneuverability of a train.Ģ. Everywhere I looked, I found a premium ship, and most of the time it was Oktyabrskaya Revolutsiya. exactly the opposite happened in this ranked sprint. ![]() I remember WG stated few years ago that things in its games will not be "pay to win". Encountering extremely high numbers of premium ships - Kamikaze, as someone said above, but also Gremyashchy, Okhotnik, Fujin, Murmansk, Giulio Cesare, Texas and Oktyabrskaya Revolutsiya with its special consumables. The only thing I liked about this ranked sprint was having less frustration about the repair cost, compared to tier X ranked.ġ. ![]() It seems that it become a tradition for WG to do things wrongheaded.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |